Documentary / Nature
Environmental Photographer of the Year
CIWEM's Environmental Photographer of the Year can suit photographers who want their work to inform debate about water, climate and human responses. Entry is free for adults as well as younger photographers, but that financial accessibility comes with substantial reuse permissions.
Our assessment · Worth considering
A credible free platform for environmental stories, with a broad image licence to weigh carefully.
Our judgement: worth considering when your primary purpose is to communicate an environmental story and you are comfortable with the organiser's public-benefit and partner uses. The absence of an entry fee removes a financial barrier, but it should not be the whole decision. A commercially valuable image or sensitive documentary project may carry obligations that make the licence unattractive. We would assess this as a targeted storytelling opportunity, not simply another free place to submit an attractive nature photograph. [1][2]
A good fit for
Think carefully if
Photo Competitions’ editorial judgement · 2025 — completed edition; next call not confirmed · Reviewed 4 Oct 2026
What you will actually pay
Entry costs, explained.
Free worldwide for amateur and professional photographers of all ages; up to three photographs.
| Entry route | Cost | Who and what it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Main competition and overall title | Free; up to 3 still photographs | All ages worldwide, professional or amateur. Under-18 entrants need parent/guardian approval. [1][2] |
There is no separate paid route to qualify for the headline title: category submissions are considered automatically. Time spent on captions, permissions and the ethics statement remains part of the cost of preparing a credible entry. [2]
The environmental story needs to be explicit
The 2025 categories address water across landscapes, nature-based solutions, adaptation to flood or drought, and stewardship. The brief is interested in human responses as well as environmental harm. A useful submission should explain what is happening and why it matters, rather than rely on a caption that merely names an endangered place or species. [1]
CIWEM-appointed judges choose the winners and shortlist. Our advice is to make the relationship between photograph and environmental issue legible without exaggerated claims. A striking aerial abstraction, for example, still needs accurate context about the process being shown; visual drama is not evidence by itself. [2]
An established organiser and a relevant audience
CIWEM describes the returning 2025 competition as its 17th edition, supported by Arup and the Brave Blue World Foundation. That institutional context helps explain the emphasis on water and practical environmental responses. [1]
The Guardian published an illustrated selection from the 2023 competition. [3]
For us, the important distinction is between a relevant communication platform and a guaranteed career benefit. We would not translate an institution's involvement into promised sales or commissions. The contest makes most sense where environmental communication is already part of the photographer's work and where reuse through that network is an intended outcome. [1]
Modest cash with targeted publication benefits
The 2025 overall winner was offered £1,000, an interview in CIWEM's Environment Magazine and a Brave Blue World Foundation feature. Four category winners were offered £500 each. Organiser and partner channels, including the foundation's screenings, were part of the stated promotion. These are different recipient-level benefits, not one cash payment for every winner. [1]
Judge the package by whether that setting is useful for your story. A feature can provide a reason to share a project with relevant contacts, but it is not a replacement for a paid commission. This review does not import equipment packages or youth awards from older editions. [1]
Young entrants are allowed; photographs of children are not
For 2025, images had to date from 1 January 2023 onward and must not already have won a top competition prize. Entrants under 18 needed guardian approval. Separately, the rules barred photographs depicting people under 18. Those are distinct rules about the photographer and the subject. [2]
Consent and an ethics statement form part of the submission. Check these before editing a shortlist: a moving photograph is not necessarily an eligible photograph. Documentary work involving vulnerable people deserves a considered account of how it was made and how reuse might affect its subjects. [2]
Read the licence as part of the entry decision
Copyright stays with the photographer, but every entry grants five years of worldwide, non-exclusive sublicensable use for the award and CIWEM activities, including associated merchandising. Partner marketing and onward editorial or promotional distribution are allowed. Revenue-generating third-party licensing is contemplated; ancillary use requires good-faith consultation about a revenue share, not a guaranteed fixed royalty. [2]
This goes beyond displaying a winner in a gallery. Someone choosing this contest should be comfortable with the breadth of the arrangement, rather than assume that free entry means there is no meaningful exchange. Commercial restrictions or subject promises may make another outlet more appropriate. [2]
A completed call with strict authenticity checks
The 2025 cutoff was 23:59 BST on 28 September. Submit high-resolution JPEGs and preserve originals for verification. AI creation and editing are prohibited. Limited conventional adjustments, declared same-scene panoramas, focus stacks and multiple exposures are allowed; adding or removing scene elements is not. [2]
Prepare captions and permissions alongside the files. The next call may revise categories, image dates and licence wording, so use this completed edition to assess suitability rather than as permission to submit under unchanged future conditions. [1][2]
Details still worth checking.
No later open call was verified. The licence does not promise a fixed payment for ancillary commercial use, and current 2025 rules should not be assumed to govern a future edition. [2]
The evidence behind this review
Sources & last checked.
Fees, rules and prize details come from the organiser. Independent reporting supports our assessment of reputation; it does not guarantee publicity or a return on your entry fee.
- The Environmental Photographer of the Year competition returns in 2025 - CIWEMOrganiser source · Checked 4 Oct 2026
- EPOTY 2025 full competition rulesOrganiser source · Checked 4 Oct 2026
- The Guardian: Environmental Photographer of the Year 2023 winnersIndependent reporting · Checked 4 Oct 2026
Dates, fees and terms can change. Read the current rules on the official competition website before entering.