Documentary
Aftermath Project Grant
The Aftermath Project offers one US$25,000 production grant and names four finalists. A convincing proposal must explain the story after violence, with the photographs and written case carrying comparable weight.
Our assessment · Recommended for the right photographer
Substantial support for the long aftermath of conflict, with concrete production and image-use commitments.
Our editorial judgement: recommended for working documentary photographers with a sustained relationship to a post-conflict story. The funding can support meaningful time in the field, and the programme has a documented exhibition and educational afterlife. It is not a reward for a single striking frame: the application must show why a body of work is needed and how the photographer can make it responsibly. [1][5]
A good fit for
- A still-photography project about rebuilding lives, institutions or communities after conflict. [3]
Photo Competitions’ editorial judgement · 2026 post-conflict grant · Reviewed 4 Oct 2026
What you will actually pay
Entry costs, explained.
No application fee or payment step is requested in the published 2026 instructions.
| Entry route | Cost | Who and what it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Post-conflict grant application | No payment requested | Working photographers worldwide; full-time students excluded. [1][2] |
The instructions require files sent through a sharing service, rather than a paid entry checkout. No paid upgrade is offered. The practical investment is preparing an articulate proposal and a tightly edited portfolio; do not confuse a free application with a project that will be inexpensive to deliver. [1]
Explain what remains after the headline
The organisation grew from Sara Terry’s work on Bosnia’s recovery and describes its purpose as bringing attention to what happens after conflict. That remit rewards patience and specificity. A proposal about recovery should identify who is rebuilding, what has changed, and what remains unresolved, instead of assuming a broad statement about suffering supplies the story. [3]
The call allows aftermaths of community or regional conflict as well as war, including some prolonged conflicts. Domestic violence or environmental disaster needs a clear conflict connection. It funds production of still photographs, not a book, exhibition or video budget. A project may be unstarted; previous work can demonstrate narrative ability. [1]
Evidence extends beyond an award announcement
The Ukrainian Association of Professional Photographers reported a discussion with Terry and a past recipient about applying, describing close attention to a photographer’s motivation, visual sequence and written explanation. Its account of the Wounds project focused on injured Ukrainians and their families over time. This is substantive outside engagement with the programme’s photographic approach, rather than simply a listing of an available grant. [4]
Exhibits USA’s How We Rebuild brings together twelve years of work from winners and finalists. Its programme includes Glenna Gordon, Nina Berman, Andrew Lichtenstein and Jessica Hines, and records a tour extending to January 2028 with past and booked venues. That supplies a concrete example of photographs continuing to circulate after the grant year; it is not a promise that each new applicant’s work will join the same tour. [5]
Our view is that this history makes the opportunity particularly relevant to photographers seeking a public conversation around a long project. It is less directly useful if the main aim is a commercial campaign credit or an immediate gallery sale. Evaluate the programme against the intended audience for the proposed story. [4][5]
One grant, paid in stages
The 2026 call promises one US$25,000 grant and four finalists, without advertising cash for those finalists. Funding is paid 50% initially, 40% midway and 10% after print delivery. Work must finish by 1 January 2028, with photographs delivered by 1 May. The award is production support, not unrestricted prize money. [1][2]
Plan the first phase against the first instalment, not the headline sum. Travel, research and access can consume money before photographs are ready, while the retained final instalment comes after tangible deliverables. A sensible internal budget helps even though the application itself does not require one. [2][1]
A working practice and a credible proposal
Working photographers worldwide may apply; full-time students and specified organiser, adviser or judging connections are excluded. No fixed capture-date window is stated for the supporting portfolio. Applicants must own the submitted work and accept the signed terms. [2]
The call requires a two-page proposal with a one-sentence summary, up to thirty captioned JPEGs, a separate caption sheet and a two-paragraph biography. It says the statement matters as much as the photographs. The reviewed call does not name the 2026 judges, so this assessment makes no claim about particular jurors’ preferences. [1]
Finalists grant use as well as the winner
Copyright remains with photographers. The winner supplies twelve prints of at least 16×20 inches and makes thirty or more project images available for exhibition, publication, education and promotion. Finalists provide ten to fifteen images for similar uses. Credit is required; payment and publication are not guaranteed. Any available press/publicity income is split equally with the photographer. [2]
The terms do not specify a licence end date. The educational scope fits the programme’s mission, but photographers should obtain permissions that accommodate it before promising exclusive use elsewhere. For a finalist, the relevant decision is whether this public use of existing work is acceptable without the main grant’s financial support. [2][3]
A file-based application, due in December
The signed 2026 form gives a deadline of midnight PST on 1 December 2026. Send the required files through the stated sharing-service route to the official application address. This review has not submitted anything on a photographer’s behalf. [2]
Before submission, read the proposal without the portfolio, then reverse the exercise. The text should establish the significance and achievable scope; the edit should demonstrate an ability to sustain the story visually. Remove redundant frames, check every caption and verify that the shared files can be accessed. A clear application is part of showing that the eventual project can be delivered. [4][1]
Details still worth checking.
The fee description reflects the complete published instructions, which request no payment; there is no separately worded fee declaration. Licence duration and named 2026 jurors are not specified. These limits are disclosed without inventing terms. [1][2]
The evidence behind this review
Sources & last checked.
Fees, rules and prize details come from the organiser. Independent reporting supports our assessment of reputation; it does not guarantee publicity or a return on your entry fee.
- 2026 post-conflict grant application and FAQOrganiser source · Checked 4 Oct 2026
- Signed application and binding obligationsOrganiser source · Checked 4 Oct 2026
- Mission, history and educational useOrganiser source · Checked 4 Oct 2026
- UAPP: reporting on the grant and recipient adviceIndependent reporting · Checked 4 Oct 2026
- Exhibits USA: How We Rebuild tourOrganiser source · Checked 4 Oct 2026
Dates, fees and terms can change. Read the current rules on the official competition website before entering.