An independent eye on photography competitionsFor photographers. Since 2006.
PhotoCompetitions.Since 2006
For organisers

The journal / Field notes

How to Avoid Rights Grabs in Photography Competitions

Many photography competitions include clauses that sign away your image rights. Here's how to spot them, what they mean, and which competitions to avoid.

PhotoCompetitions10 Mar 2026

You've found a photography competition with a decent prize and an interesting theme. You're ready to enter. But have you read the terms and conditions?

Every year, thousands of photographers unknowingly sign away valuable rights to their images by entering competitions with exploitative terms. The organisers get a library of high-quality images they can use however they want — for marketing, merchandise, stock licensing — while the photographer gets nothing beyond a possible mention.

This is what the photography community calls a rights grab, and it's more common than you'd think.

What Is a Rights Grab?

A rights grab occurs when a competition's terms grant the organiser broad usage rights to your submitted images, often in perpetuity and without compensation. The most egregious examples include:

  • Transfer of copyright: You literally give away ownership of your image.
  • Unlimited usage licence: The organiser can use your image for any purpose, forever, without paying you.
  • Sub-licensing rights: The organiser can sell or licence your image to third parties.
  • No attribution required: Your image can be used without crediting you.

How to Spot a Rights Grab

Before entering any competition, search the terms for these red-flag phrases:

  1. "Irrevocable, perpetual, worldwide licence" — This means forever, everywhere, and you can't take it back.
  2. "For any purpose including commercial" — Your landscape shot could end up on a billboard you never agreed to.
  3. "The organiser may sub-licence" — Third parties you've never heard of can use your work.
  4. "By entering, you grant..." — Merely submitting gives them rights, whether you win or not.
  5. "All entries become the property of..." — The clearest rights grab of all.

What Fair Terms Look Like

Legitimate competitions typically include terms like:

  • "Photographers retain full copyright" — The gold standard.
  • "Limited licence for competition promotion only" — The organiser can show your image in connection with the competition, but nothing more.
  • "For a period of 12 months" — Time-limited usage that expires.
  • "With photographer credit" — Your name stays attached to your work.

Our Rights Rating System

At PhotoCompetitions, we rate every competition's rights terms to help you make informed decisions:

  • Excellent: Photographer retains full copyright. Usage limited to competition promotion with credit.
  • Good: Photographer retains copyright. Organiser has limited promotional usage rights.
  • Fair: Some extended usage rights, but not unreasonable for the value offered.

We don't list competitions with exploitative rights terms. If a competition demands broad rights with little in return, it doesn't make our database.

What to Do If You've Already Entered

If you've entered a competition and later discovered problematic rights terms:

  1. Contact the organiser and request your images be withdrawn.
  2. Document everything — screenshot the terms, save confirmation emails.
  3. Check your local consumer protection laws — in many jurisdictions, unfair contract terms can be challenged.
  4. Warn others — share your experience with the photography community.

Read our full Rights Terms Guide for a deeper dive into understanding competition terms, or browse our competition listings where every entry includes a clear rights rating.